Cipralex vs. paroxetine

Cipralex is significantly more effective than paroxetine in the long-term treatment of severely depressed patients.

Adjusted mean change from baseline to Week 24 in MADRS total score (ref.1)

(a) Adjusted mean change from baseline to Week 24 in MADRS total score (ITT, LOCF).
*significantly different from paroxetine, p<0.05
  • From week 8 onwards, Cipralex provides a significantly larger decrease in MADRS total score than paroxetine. (ref.1)

Adjusted mean change from baseline to Week 24 in MADRS total score in very severely depressed patients (ref.1)

(b) Adjusted mean change from baseline to Week 24 in MADRS total score for very severely
depressed patients (baseline MADRS total score ≥35) (ITT, LOCF) (adapted from Boulenger et al.,
2006).
*significantly different from paroxetine, p<0.05
  • For the very severely depressed patients (MADRS >=35) Cipralex has a significantly higher decrease of MADRS points than paroxetine onwards from week 4.

Complete remission (MADRS ≤5) rate (%) (ref.1)

Analysis of complete remission rates (defined as MADRS ≤5) for escitalopram versus paroxetine at last assessment (LOCF), by baseline severity analyses (adjusted for country instead of centre from MADRS ≥36, due to low patient numbers) (Boulenger et al., 2006).
# Significantly different from paroxetine, p<0.05
## Significantly different from paroxetine, p<0.01
### Significantly different from paroxetine, p<0.001
  • The higher the severity at baseline - the larger the difference between Cipralex and paroxetine. Significantly more Cipralex patients achieved symptom-free remission (MADRS<=5) than paroxetine patients. (ref.1)

References:

1. Boulenger et al. 2006

Published: 24/07/2006   Last updated: 27/07/2010
 
Key publication

[no alt text]

www.irecover.com www.mypdinfo.com www.ebixa.com www.azilect.com www.serdolect.com www.depnet.com Disclaimer

H. Lundbeck A/S - Ottiliavej 9 - DK-2500 Copenhagen Valby - Phone +45 3630 1311 - Contact us

Lundbeck logo